2 April 2020 (Day 14) - Almost there. Our release from
strict quarantine/self-isolation comes tomorrow. We’re both feeling fine – just
old and anxious.
Karen and I have a lengthy shopping list that we hope
to shop for tomorrow during the seniors hour. Whether we’ll be able to get
everything we need and want remains to be seen. We saw how panic buying and
disruptions to supply chains emptied shelves at the Tesco where we shopped in
Maldon before we left the UK.
I’m feeling nervous about just going out of
the apartment. The assumption at this point is that we’re C19-free. (Our
understanding is that 99.99% of people infected show symptoms within 14 days,
most within five to seven, and we don’t have any symptoms.) Now, every time we
go out of our home, though, we’re very much at risk of being exposed.
We will be taking precautions, both at the stores and
when we return. I wrote in an earlier post about the protocols we followed for
bringing our delivered groceries into the apartment last week and disinfecting them. We’ll do the
same again.
There has been considerable debate among medical
experts and others about whether we should be wearing masks when we go out. We don't have masks in any case, but I heard it suggested on the radio today that even a bandanna wrapped around your face could offer some protection. And in the Czech Republic, where they reportedly have the epidemic in better control than we do, it is required that you wear a mask when you go out.
The only reasons I can see for not wearing a mask are that real medical-grade masks are needed much more urgently by healthcare professionals and are in short supply. And there is a risk, if you don't remove your personal protection with caution, that it could actually increase chances of infection. Canada’s Chief Medical Officer is advising against non-infected or -exposed people wearing masks. But she added, in an interview I heard on the radio yesterday, that the keys to preventing infection when removing protection are not touching your face and washing your hands carefully afterwards.
The only reasons I can see for not wearing a mask are that real medical-grade masks are needed much more urgently by healthcare professionals and are in short supply. And there is a risk, if you don't remove your personal protection with caution, that it could actually increase chances of infection. Canada’s Chief Medical Officer is advising against non-infected or -exposed people wearing masks. But she added, in an interview I heard on the radio yesterday, that the keys to preventing infection when removing protection are not touching your face and washing your hands carefully afterwards.
We
will have hand-sanitizer with us when we go out, and wear re-usable latex gloves. I plan to extend washing after the fact to clothes
and the rest of my body. Clothes worn when I go out will go in the laundry
hamper, not to be touched again for at least 48 hours. And I’ll shower.
I know, it sounds absurd. But if you’re a senior and
you’re not freaked by this pandemic, you’re a feckin’ idiot. Anybody really,
not just seniors.
*
I am smarting this morning after another humiliating
defeat on the Scrabble field at the hands of my darling wife.
It wasn’t a bad defeat, only by 15 or 20 points but it
still stings. The wins have been few and far between this year. And Karen
insists my summary of recent Scrabble activity in yesterday’s post actually
understated how badly she’s been whomping me recently. Possible.
As for last night, in my defense, I had terrible
letters. My first pull included the Q, the Z, three E’s, an O and one other
letter I can’t remember – but not U. I couldn’t use either of the big scorers
until at least six turns in, by which time Karen had zoomed way ahead. After
the first couple of pulls, I never had more than two vowels in my hand at any
one time. At the end of the game, I still had about 16 points in my hand, all
consonants.
*
This morning I started my new job, creating a closed
Facebook group for our building. It’s a learning experience, but nothing wrong
with that. Even old dogs, I keep telling myself, can learn new tricks. So far
so good.
*
Desert
Island: Definitely desert island material. The fourth movement of the Rachmaninoff sonata is sublime.
Some music snobs turn their noses up at Sergei Rachmaninoff, the 20th century Russian composer (1873-1943).
One American composer and critic, now largely forgotten, said of Rachmaninoff's music that
it was “mainly an evocation of adolescence” and “no part of our intellectual
life.” Sergei was definitely swimming against the minimalist, atonal current of
modern orchestral music. His work is tuneful, accessible, very romantic, a
throw-back to the music of the late 19th century when he came of age.
Dirty
Hippy: I’d never heard of J. J. Cale until about 20 years
ago, but he’s definitely of our era (1938-2013), and he’s now a regular part of
my mix whenever I’m looking for social music that’s not too crash-and-bangy.
The
Cryptic Corner
From today’s Globe
& Mail puzzle, a few illustrative examples:
“Shipping trade (5).” As the form suggests it’s a
double-meaning clue, but it’s a tricky one.
The non-cryptic part of a cryptic clue isn’t
necessarily an exact synonym for or definition of the answer. As in this case,
it can be a word that might, only in some contexts, be a synonym for the answer.
Or might be only a near-synonym that could be substituted for the answer in a
sentence sometimes.
The answer: CRAFT.
You might refer to water “craft,” boats, in some contexts as
“shipping.” You’re meant to be confused by trade – is it the verb, the noun
from the verb, or a noun meaning...well, a “craft.” It’s true that you wouldn’t
call the trade of electrician a craft, but you might call carpentry a
craft, or a trade.
Some clues offer concocted, sometimes humorous
definitions for a phrase formed when you break up the answer word into constituent
parts.
Here’s an example from today’s puzzle: “A policeman not on duty perhaps is unusual (7).”
Here’s an example from today’s puzzle: “A policeman not on duty perhaps is unusual (7).”
Answer: OFFBEAT. Get it? The non-cryptic clue is “unusual.”
The policeman, you see, is “off” his “beat.”
One more. Here’s another example of the non-cryptic
clue not being an exact definition or
synonym. “Work in a band to commit fraud (6).”
Answer: FIDDLE.
Well, in some “bands” one or more members fiddle. A
fiddle is also a colloquial term for a “fraud.”
Finally, here’s the puzzle as far as I’ve got it. Any
ideas about the last two? (Gail Wreford, c’mon, you’re a crossword fiend – time you
stepped up to cryptics.)
I remember a friend of John Savage's talking us into seeing JJ Cale at Convocation Hall at UofT. Google tells me it was November 9, 1979. Ticket stub for sale on Ebay for $14.99, lol. I remember how he hung out in the shadows at the side of the stage for most of the show, and me wondering whether he had stage-fright.
ReplyDelete